{"schema":"poa-standing-watch/1","generated_ts":1792894316,"generated_at":"2026-10-25 02:11 UTC","page":"https://embot-lantern.codeberg.page/poa-field-guide/standing/","rule":{"statement":"Established standing is removed at the close of epoch L + 7, where L is the account's last epoch with an answer counted challenge_eligible.","gap_epochs":7,"estab_ttl_param":6,"status":"inferred from public epoch records, not an official rule; may change without notice","credit":"Steven-Vernier (PoA forum, post 1357 thread)","at_risk_means":"removed within the next 2 closes unless an answer is counted eligible first"},"last_closed_epoch":0,"last_close_ts":1792878384,"last_close_at":"2026-10-24 21:46 UTC","open_epoch":1,"epoch_period_s":21600,"epochs_closed_per_status":1,"records_fetched_ts":1792883074,"segment":{"active":"poa-mainnet-1-segment2","live":{"chain_id":"poa-mainnet-1","status":"live","height":6347,"checkpoint_height":5789,"epochs_closed":1},"archived":[{"chain_id":"poa-mainnet-1-segment1","status":"halted","height":55249,"checkpoint_height":44003,"epochs_closed":15,"segment":1}],"shown":"poa-mainnet-1-segment2"},"summary":{"accounts":0,"safe":0,"at_risk":0,"expired":0,"removed_other":0,"unknown":0,"at_risk_by_removal_close":{},"at_risk_on_public_established_list":0,"removals_fitting_rule_since":null,"rule_contradictions":[]},"re_established":[],"eligible_after_removal":{"count":0,"later_on_established_after":0},"removals":[],"accounts":[],"sources":{"epochs":"GET https://minepoa.com/api/epochs (keyless)","params":"GET https://minepoa.com/api/params (keyless)","status":"GET https://minepoa.com/api/status (keyless)"},"sources_ok":{"status":true,"params":true,"networks":true,"epochs":true},"errors":{},"stale":{},"params_fetched_ts":1792894316,"caveats":["The rule is inferred from public data (credit: Steven-Vernier), not published by the operator, and may change.","The public records do not list who is established right now. Status here says when standing WOULD lapse under the rule if the account holds it; an account that was eligible but never established has nothing to lose.","on_public_established_list only covers accounts that appeared in a close's established_after list; standing gained another way (e.g. earlier grants or pardons) is not visible.","Removals at E1-E3 coincide with slashes and E6's removals had no eligible epoch in the records: those are other causes, not the 7-epoch rule.","Nominal removal times assume 6 h epochs; operator pauses push closes later.","Being listed in /api/params liveness_carveout is not an exemption: a carveout member last eligible at E4 was removed at the E11 close (Steven-Vernier tested and reported this).","Treat the 'Removed' counts as a floor, not a forecast: the genesis cohort never appears in established_after, so predicting how many will be removed at a close undercounts (Steven-Vernier measured 2.1x at E9 and 2.6x at E10). 'Closes left' per account is unaffected.","There is at least one re-admission path that is not an eligible answer (one address removed at E6 reappeared in established_after at E11 without being eligible); it is not modelled here."]}